Skip to main content

When Gods make the Tools

When it comes to creating tools, some people just don’t get it.

Consider this continuum. At the left end, man does everything. And at the right end, the tool does everything. The fundamental decision a tool designer needs to make is – Where to draw the red line! How much should the tool do?

Its an evident fact that the more the tool does, the successful it becomes. "Human shall sweat less" is the design mantra. Google is one good example. The engine keeps watching your activities and understands your preferences. The inferred profile is then used to make the search results personalized for you. You are not expected to describe about yourself anytime anywhere.

Now, I am ok if you make the tool do a very minimum initially. The bottom line is - it has to be a decent amount of function, well defined, well delivered and well composable. Like a motor. It makes a decent part of many big systems, composed of many such parts.

And the intelligent of creators further take effort to make the tool open for future expansions. And the wisest of them make the tools open for expansion, not by the creator but by the end users themselves. This is what we call leveraging the ‘emergent behavior’. Tools like Facebook and Twitter are not accidental hits. They are created by clever engineers who consciously exploit this emergent behavior.

So that is that.
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJuly 15, 2010 at 9:58 PM

    Which tool will you declare as your proudest creation? - Spidey

    ReplyDelete
  2. Raja SPJuly 15, 2010 at 11:30 PM

    I have none, Spidey. But will create one before I die :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. aasamyJuly 17, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    What tool pissed you off so much as to the the "people just don't get it" comment - trying to ponder the flip side of google/fb examples.

    BTW, I though the design mantra was: how can we package this so that people pay for it without knowing that they are paying for it:-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Raja SPJuly 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM

    @ Anty : Can't exactly discuss that here. Over phone! LOL! That design mantra! Probably, it works the best when dealing with simpletons and suckers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Birthdays and Facebook

I read about a guy who had 400+ friends in Facebook. One day he woke up as a curious little wanker and wondered if he is really that sociable. So he organized a party and sent invitations to all his contacts over Facebook. 50% confirmed and another 20% were tentative. He was delighted - that’s one hell of a response, actually. The real day came. Our man waited at the venue, which happened to be a popular joint, but no single soul turned up. An hour later, one woman came but she also left in the next 30 minutes. He had 400 friends and yet he ended up drinking alone that night. So the question to ponder is how close are our virtual worlds to the reality? . But my case was quite not as somber. Yesterday was my birthday. Facebook reminded of it to a whole lot of my gang. Some of them have never wished me in decades and some are new. How exciting! So here is my big thanks to all my dear friends for the wishes over calls, sms and facebook. You made me feel special. Special thanks to cutie p...
9 comments
Read more

What is my utilitarianism?

I am a utilitarian. Do you know how hard it is to live as a utilitarian these days? You often get mocked in closer circles. In the pretentious places, you are looked down upon. You are generally pushed to feel like a flying swine - strange, curious and out of place. The problem is the word ‘utility’ in it. The commoners derive a shallow meaning that it is utility before happiness. Utility before pleasure. Stretching it a bit, they think that a utilitarian denies pleasures, leads a boring life of a miser, does not appreciate finer things in life and is generally a philistine. But utilitarianism is exactly opposite of that. I will be a damned liar if I declare that I am holy and have renounced all the pleasures. The tricky thing, and here in lies a great secret about the art of living, is to understand what pleasure really is. I think there is such a thing as ‘ supreme ’ pleasure. And by virtue of the existence of a supreme pleasure, there are also ‘ inferio...
2 comments
Read more

Sift Audience Data Query Language (DQL) – 1

I had been thinking long and hard on enhancing the Audience Management capability in Sift. Everybody seems to have it - from the mighty big players to the obscure ones. In such a crowded space, it is of prime importance to have a very clear and a striking "unique selling proposition" before you boast that you have this capability too. Basically, the tool shall solve a problem that was very challenging previously, in a cost effective way that was not thought of commonly. Now, Sift is a real time analytics engine. So obviously, the profiles it builds about individual entities are accurate - up to the second. That gets a lot of brownies to start with. And as Sift would limitlessly process data, the data points it can compute for a single entity would also be much wider in range. This is great too. But, 1. What if I add "relationships between the entities" into this mix? For example, retrieving " all customers who just visited a particular online storefront...
7 comments
Read more